
Mitch Easter
A Rock Master Adds
12-String Bass to the Palette
An Interview with Philip Snyder
|
|
Mitch Easter is one of the rock world's great guitarists and producers. His band Let's Active (I.R.S.) gained regional and international recognition from 1981 through 1990. They released an EP and three full-length albums during this time. Mitch worked as a session guitarist on recordings by such artists as Marti Jones and Suzanne Vega. Mitch is also a well-known producer and engineer (R.E.M., Let's Active, Pavement) and a strong songwriter. Recently he purchased a Chandler Royale 12-string bass for use in his new band Fiendish Minstrels. This is what he had to say about joining the ranks of the 12-string bassists. |
Let's get some background first. How old were you when you started playing and what were your earliest influences?
Tell me a little about Let's Active and what
doors that band opened for you.
Let's Active was started in '81 and we
were deliberately trying to have the sound of that era. I'd been playing
for ages by then, which almost felt like a disadvantage. Lots of the
significant early 80's bands were made up of inspired beginners, and
standard-issue "rock" was to be avoided! Which was fine with me, I always
liked the slightly odder bands anyway. As much as I was a product,
guitar-wise, of the late 60's-early 70's I enjoyed the challenge of at least
halfway re-inventing myself as a player. So I was using dinky amps and thin
sounds and it led to new things. That was fine for awhile but we quickly
started slipping more "rock" back into the picture. Anyway, we were able
to get signed to I.R.S. Records and for a couple of years it was great to be
able to tour, have our records in the shops, and really feel the record biz
working. I was so completely used to being ignored, and now we were getting
fan mail! Wow. It was a generally good time for music, lots of my friends
got things going then. In my case, I was also recording people in the
studio and I got some notice for that. That's what led to the band getting
a chance, I think. I was getting some attention, then we had Faye Hunter on
bass and Sara Romweber on drums which was a plus. They played well and
people were happy to see a band that wasn't the usual bunch of dudes,
especially around that time.
How would you categorize yourself these days? Are
your interests still mainly around playing or are they split evenly with
producing?
It's been great to be able to work in
the studio for my Real Job, but I would immediately go on the World Tour if
there was any justification for it!
You are currently in two bands with your wife
Shalini... Fiendish Minstrels and Shalini. In Shalini you
are the guitarist and Shalini is on bass, but in Fiendish Minstrels you are
making the jump to bass and it's a 12-string at that! What made you decide
to play bass in that band and why did you decide on making that bass a 12?
Yeah, we have these two bands. Shalini
came first and that's our mostly straight-ahead rock band. Shalini is the
bass player and usually plays a Precision, but I got the Royale while we
were finishing up the latest disk, so it turned up on a couple of tracks. We started the Fiendish Minstrels mainly to be able to book more shows! It's the exact same lineup, but the FMs is "my" band in that it's my songs
and I sing more. Shalini is still the bass player, and the plan is to use
the Royale all the time in the Fiendish Minstrels. In the studio, we all
just play whatever, so I play bass too, and Shalini does some guitar. We
start off doing things like we'd do it onstage but things just evolve in the
studio as we develop the tracks.
|
|
|
Shalini relaxes with her new friend! |
How would you describe the band's sound?
Rock, you know! Definitely pop songs,
but I have a wide definition of pop; I certainly don't mean any kind of
strict 60's-style songwriting, but I figure anything I write will vaguely
refer to anything I've ever heard... it's all fair game. Right now I plan
on trying to make the new record sort of noisy and simple, but what you have
in your head sometimes turns into something else by the time you get
something that works in a recording. I think using the 12-string bass is
going to have a big impact on the sound; it seems like this instrument makes
you think in terms of big, bold sounds, and not little details. Anyway,
there's my dreadful singing, so right away that keeps it from being like
proper stadium rock or anything, although we probably do play at "stadium"
levels. We are definitely a big-amps band, and our drummer Eric Marshall is
a truly magnificent rock drummer.
How much of the Fiendish Minstrels material are you
planning on using the 12 on? Do you find that it helps to separate the
sounds of the two bands you are in with your wife?
100% is the plan! The bands sound
different, anyway. In Shalini we consider "Highway to Hell" to be the
greatest possible song so we've stolen as many elements of that approach as
possible, while recognizing that nobody can hope to attain the mastery of
AC/DC. (Although I just heard a live recording of Cheap Trick doing "Highway
to Hell" live and holy shit!! Surely Bon would approve.) The
Fiendish
Minstrels is a bit more open-ended noisy rock at the moment, lutes
tomorrow, maybe. Although I doubt it.
Your 12-string has a pretty unique history! Can
you tell us about it?
You may know more than I do. I found
this one last fall. Adrian Chandler told me it had just come back from an
Aerosmith session, and it was going to be the "shop bass" although they'd
sell it to me. It took me about 5 seconds to decide "all right!"
especially since they weren't going to make any more of them until sometime
this year.
I'm not aware of any further Celebrity mojo...
Yeah... Tom Hamilton had that bass for a while, but Aerosmith had to
leave to go on tour with KISS and Tom wasn't going to have much time to
experiment with it so he sent it back to Chandler. I'm hopeful that Tom
will order one in the near future.
Had you played any other brands of 12-string basses
prior to buying the Chandler? How did they compare to the Royale in your
opinion? What led you to the Royale?
I buy guitars all the time without
trying them out. I get a feeling about one and just go for it, and I'm
hardly ever disappointed! I think maybe this is my one psychic area... but
beyond that, anytime you get a new instrument, you have to get used to it
and figure out what to do with it. So I never worry if feels strange at
first- in fact, I think that's fun. Of course, the Royale arrived perfectly
set-up, and perfectly in tune, for that matter! It had the tuning that Paul
Chandler mentioned where one of the octave G strings is tuned to D for a
sort of instant power chord up there- and I'm keeping it that way, I dig
it. And if you play a E-shape chord with this tuning, you get a major 7th. Cool!
Six months ago I actually thought that
maybe the only 12-string basses in existence were the ones Hamer made for
Tom Petersson! I had no idea there were several manufacturers and such a
scene for them until I found this web site. Where had I been all these
years?? Anyway, to conclude, I probably would've tried to get a Royale back
when they first came out if I'd known about them. It is just about the most
magnificent-looking thing I've ever seen! Not only is the finish lovely, I
love the pearloid material on the head, the deco look of the pickups, and
the scale of the whole affair. It's huge, but the proportions are so
right. The output wiring is clever (this one is the two-outputs version)
and the humbucking / single-coil selection on two of the pickups allows for
lots of sounds.
What do the other members of your band think of the
12?
You have quite a collection of gear that you've
acquired over the years. What components are you building a bass rig out
of? Have you tried anything unusual that you thought really hit the spot?
Personally, I reject the idea that an amp, microphone, etc. is
"for" a certain sound- they're for whatever you use them for! Another great
bass amp is anything from Kustom's golden age. I have a 2 x 12 Kustom 150
that's a stellar bass amp. For these new sessions I'll probably use
Shalini's blue 120 watt Matamp, with a 4 x 12 Matamp cabinet, along with
either the Twin or a very old Matamp 2000, a 30 watt class-A amp, and
another 4 x 12. Maybe with a direct box, maybe not. I'm thinking one of
the bigger Kustoms with the high-frequency horn would be pretty spectacular
along with the blue Matamp for the 12. That may become the stage rig.
Coming from a '60s / '70s rock background with
influences like yours I would expect that you have an affinity for vintage
gear. Even though the Royale isn't a vintage instrument it does have that
vibe. Do you lean towards vintage amps with the Royale?
Fiendish Minstrels
You also own your own studio, right? When you
record with the 12 are you running direct, micing a cabinet, or a little of
both? Are there any effects or certain pieces of gear that you particularly
like for the Royale?
I have a funny view of gear- I love it, but I
don't expect it to necessarily matter that much. I mean, if I can't get a
good sound, I figure it's my fault! So I'm still playing through a Marshall
cabinet I've had since I was 15. And I'm pretty happy to have let certain
equipment fashions pass me by while I kept using the same old junk. This
has been useful for the studio. All the bands who record here are welcome
to use the amps and guitars, and the old gear I've got is usually what they
want to use. It's funny how that equipment seems to always come through. And the new amps I've got are definitely in the quasi-"vintage" realm-
things like the Carr Slant 6V and Mercury, both all-tube amps which are
Built They Way They Used To Build 'Em, except better, actually. But I'm no
vintage purist, I just like what works. Still, I will probably always think
that a Naugahyde-era Kustom is just gorgeous- lots of that old stuff just
looks good to me and I like to have it around. It's probably from growing
up in the Rat Fink years. Bass equipment, in particular, has gotten stuck
in a utilitarian mode for years, and if you ask me, it's high time for some
fruitcake fashions on stage: I figure if we get this Royale-Matamp-Kustom
situation going, that will qualify! It will amuse me, anyway. Let me
mention my deep appreciation for Tom Petersson's multi-Transonic setup - now
that's style!
As far as effects on this bass, it's too soon to know. As of this writing, the Royale has been on
three
tracks, but I'm about to get lots more experience. I can imagine using some
distortion off the amps or the Sans Amp Bass Driver, but probably not much
else. Maybe a bit of room sound in the recording. Every now and then a
bass part comes to life with a tiny bit of chorus or flange, but I rarely do
that. I do love tremolo bass, and I am sure a tremolo'd 12 would be a thing
of beauty.
Ah well, he should've bought this one, but
I'm glad he didn't! Adrian told me it was used on the sessions though. I'm
sure the fans will demand that he play more 12 once they hear it!
A friend of ours, Jodie Forrest, gave
Shalini the American Basses book last year, and I was paging through
it and noticed the (way too small) picture of the Royale. It looked amazing
to me. I thought "what's that??" I loved how grand and serious it
looked. "Royale" is such a perfect name for it! I had to write Chandler
and find out about it. I knew it would be good, all the other Chandler gear
I'd seen was first-rate and always very cool, too. Anyway, Adrian Chandler
wrote back and she remembered me from when I met her in the 90's during a
Marshall Crenshaw tour. And she mentioned this particular instrument.
Everybody who has seen it is sort of
stunned. Nobody much has ever seen or even heard of a 12-string bass, and
the very concept freaks them out. Which is a perfect reason to use one!
I've always loved the plonky, muted sounds of
the electric bass on old Bert Kaempfert records, or on, say, "Happenings Ten
Years Time Ago" by the Yardbirds. Carol Kaye was a wonderful
practitioner of that hand-muting / pick sound, and I read that she used a
Super Reverb for all those famous LA sessions. So when Let's Active
recorded its "Cypress" record, we used a silver-face Fender Twin Reverb for
the bass- that was the closest thing I had to a Super Reverb, and we got a
pretty interesting sound with that. Unless you were playing pretty quietly,
you'd normally blow up an open-back amp like that with bass, but this Twin
I've got has these massive EV speakers, and they can take bass, no problem. I've gone back to recording with this amp every now and then, and it's
always good.
Another great amp is, of course, the Portaflex Ampegs. But
small amps like this make no sense to most bass players who are used to 800
watt solid state things! Those big amps are great onstage but in the studio
they often have very little character. The whole thing about hearing bass
in a dense rock track is to have some distortion which generates useful
upper harmonics. I loved Ronnie Lane's tone in the Small Faces, Ron
Wood's tone in the Jeff Beck Group, and of, course, Andy Fraser's
playing in Free. These days people often use modern hi-fi bass amps
to accentuate the mechanical noises of the bass, you know, that clanky sound
which cuts through, and like anything can be cool, but is sometimes
fatiguing. The approach of actually letting your amp distort some is a lost
art to some degree, I think. SVT's are great for their power and ability to
handle anything, but even they sometimes sound like a direct box on tape
because they are so powerful and clean. So if I'm looking for an
interesting tone I usually gravitate to a smaller amp, or what people
usually think of as a "guitar amp" like a Marshall or Matamp with a 4 x 12
cabinet.
My influences are all over the place. I'm
just as interested in how they make jazz records as rock records and I'm happy
to steal anybody's good idea! Of course, I know more about rock music than
anything else. It's true that the 60's and 70's are more "romantic" for me
than any other period. For me, nothing beats imagining how they did, say,
"Axis: Bold as Love", you know? Because it was an amazing time, and recording
and playing techniques were wide open. And the performances were real. That is
always the most exciting thing- It Really Happened is always more exciting
than a carefully-crafted studio effect. I love what the studio can do but I
mostly want to hear people, not machines, unless I'm specifically listening to
electronic music. Despite much activity and lots of smart people, things are
simply more buttoned-down now, and to me present-day commercial rock music
usually comes across more like "work" and less like "inspiration". So, if for
no other reason, those old days are appealing.

I have a studio called
Fidelitorium
Recordings, and it's a sort of state-of-the-art 1989 kind of place. We
generally record on analog tape, we have a big analog console, etc. and this
is because the studio has been going for 23 years, so that's the sort of
gear we've accumulated, but also it is still the best sounding for rock
music, period. Nowadays this is seen as a "retro" (ugh, really sick of that
word) approach, but that's not our attitude. We have old stuff around here
because it works!
Now that you own a 12 would you be more inspired to produce a band that uses one? Has owning a 12 changed the way you look at bass and it's sonic placement in a band?
Do you have a favorite recording that features the 12-string bass?
Mitch, it has been a great pleasure talking with you! I'm very excited about the new band and your decision to use a 12-string bass in it. You will have to keep us posted about the band's progress and debut album! Thanks for your interest in what we're doing here at 12stringbass.net!
Published February 2, 2004
